|
|
|
@@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ |
|
|
|
"title": "Marque", |
|
|
|
"url": "/david/2024/03/09/", |
|
|
|
"date": "2024-03-09", |
|
|
|
"content": "Removing the brand from the person is all but straightforward. I now start my about page with a quick way to introduce myself by putting forward some of my values. [\u2026] Beside saying people instead of users, stop considering who\u2019s reading my stuff as audience, and quit referring to what I do as content, I want to modify a few more\u00a0behaviours: Quit mentioning well-known bloggers on a first-name basis. [\u2026] Keep writing about different things. [\u2026] Don\u2019t quote so-called thought leaders\u00a0[\u2026] Stop sugar-coating concepts\u00a0[\u2026] A Kafkaesque digital relationship with\u00a0ourselves R\u00e9flexion du jour sur le vocabulaire qui \u00e9volue pour se pr\u00e9senter sur le Web. Je suis souvent intrigu\u00e9 par les biographies et textes de pr\u00e9sentation sur mastodon qui sont \u00e0 la fois singuliers tout en respectant des codes (micro-)culturels. Peut-\u00eatre que l\u2019on a besoin de se sentir dans un cadre de repr\u00e9sentation connu pour se sentir exister dans une\u00a0communaut\u00e9. La m\u00eame autrice, en\u00a02002(!)\u00a0: Five years ago there was all this buzz about virtual communities. How did that go? I have no idea, all I know is that everything revolves around who\u2019s the hottest blogger right now. They talk about themselves, reference each other, all anxious about who has the most comments or the longest and most prestigious blogroll. Compared to that, my online journal is pure mental masturbation, but at least I have the occasional good photo and such nice\u00a0typography. Years just pass\u00a0by body:has(time[datetime]) li { list-style-type: \"\u2767 \"; } body:has( time[datetime^=\"2024-01\"], time[datetime^=\"2024-02\"], time[datetime^=\"2024-03\"] ) li { list-style-type: \"\u2746 \"; } body:has( time[datetime^=\"2024-04\"], time[datetime^=\"2024-05\"], time[datetime^=\"2024-06\"] ) li { list-style-type: \"\u2741 \"; } body:has( time[datetime^=\"2024-07\"], time[datetime^=\"2024-08\"], time[datetime^=\"2024-09\"] ) li { list-style-type: \"\u2742 \"; } J\u2019avais envie d\u2019introduire une l\u00e9g\u00e8re saisonnalit\u00e9 dans mes listes \u00e0 puces. Surtout une autre excuse pour jouer avec :has(). Je lis un peu trop de blogs qui manquent de fantaisie. Et puis il\u00a0pleut\u2026 Chant du cardinal Le matin s\u2019\u00e9veille sans toi Lov\u00e9e dans mes\u00a0bras" |
|
|
|
"content": "Removing the brand from the person is all but straightforward. I now start my about page with a quick way to introduce myself by putting forward some of my values. [\u2026] Beside saying people instead of users, stop considering who\u2019s reading my stuff as audience, and quit referring to what I do as content, I want to modify a few more\u00a0behaviours: Quit mentioning well-known bloggers on a first-name basis. [\u2026] Keep writing about different things. [\u2026] Don\u2019t quote so-called thought leaders\u00a0[\u2026] Stop sugar-coating concepts\u00a0[\u2026] A Kafkaesque digital relationship with\u00a0ourselves R\u00e9flexion du jour sur le vocabulaire qui \u00e9volue pour se pr\u00e9senter sur le Web. Je suis souvent intrigu\u00e9 par les biographies et textes de pr\u00e9sentation sur mastodon qui sont \u00e0 la fois singuliers tout en respectant des codes (micro-)culturels. Peut-\u00eatre que l\u2019on a besoin de se sentir dans un cadre de repr\u00e9sentation connu pour se sentir exister dans une\u00a0communaut\u00e9. Le m\u00eame auteur, en\u00a02002(!)\u00a0: Five years ago there was all this buzz about virtual communities. How did that go? I have no idea, all I know is that everything revolves around who\u2019s the hottest blogger right now. They talk about themselves, reference each other, all anxious about who has the most comments or the longest and most prestigious blogroll. Compared to that, my online journal is pure mental masturbation, but at least I have the occasional good photo and such nice\u00a0typography. Years just pass\u00a0by body:has(time[datetime]) li { list-style-type: \"\u2767 \"; } body:has( time[datetime^=\"2024-01\"], time[datetime^=\"2024-02\"], time[datetime^=\"2024-03\"] ) li { list-style-type: \"\u2746 \"; } body:has( time[datetime^=\"2024-04\"], time[datetime^=\"2024-05\"], time[datetime^=\"2024-06\"] ) li { list-style-type: \"\u2741 \"; } body:has( time[datetime^=\"2024-07\"], time[datetime^=\"2024-08\"], time[datetime^=\"2024-09\"] ) li { list-style-type: \"\u2742 \"; } J\u2019avais envie d\u2019introduire une l\u00e9g\u00e8re saisonnalit\u00e9 dans mes listes \u00e0 puces. Surtout une autre excuse pour jouer avec :has(). Je lis un peu trop de blogs qui manquent de fantaisie. Et puis il\u00a0pleut\u2026 Chant du cardinal Le matin s\u2019\u00e9veille sans toi Lov\u00e9e dans mes\u00a0bras" |
|
|
|
}, |
|
|
|
{ |
|
|
|
"title": "Flow", |
|
|
|
@@ -694,7 +694,7 @@ |
|
|
|
"title": "Marque", |
|
|
|
"url": "/david/2024/03/09/", |
|
|
|
"date": "2024-03-09", |
|
|
|
"content": "Removing the brand from the person is all but straightforward. I now start my about page with a quick way to introduce myself by putting forward some of my values. [\u2026] Beside saying people instead of users, stop considering who\u2019s reading my stuff as audience, and quit referring to what I do as content, I want to modify a few more\u00a0behaviours: Quit mentioning well-known bloggers on a first-name basis. [\u2026] Keep writing about different things. [\u2026] Don\u2019t quote so-called thought leaders\u00a0[\u2026] Stop sugar-coating concepts\u00a0[\u2026] A Kafkaesque digital relationship with\u00a0ourselves R\u00e9flexion du jour sur le vocabulaire qui \u00e9volue pour se pr\u00e9senter sur le Web. Je suis souvent intrigu\u00e9 par les biographies et textes de pr\u00e9sentation sur mastodon qui sont \u00e0 la fois singuliers tout en respectant des codes (micro-)culturels. Peut-\u00eatre que l\u2019on a besoin de se sentir dans un cadre de repr\u00e9sentation connu pour se sentir exister dans une\u00a0communaut\u00e9. La m\u00eame autrice, en\u00a02002(!)\u00a0: Five years ago there was all this buzz about virtual communities. How did that go? I have no idea, all I know is that everything revolves around who\u2019s the hottest blogger right now. They talk about themselves, reference each other, all anxious about who has the most comments or the longest and most prestigious blogroll. Compared to that, my online journal is pure mental masturbation, but at least I have the occasional good photo and such nice\u00a0typography. Years just pass\u00a0by body:has(time[datetime]) li { list-style-type: \"\u2767 \"; } body:has( time[datetime^=\"2024-01\"], time[datetime^=\"2024-02\"], time[datetime^=\"2024-03\"] ) li { list-style-type: \"\u2746 \"; } body:has( time[datetime^=\"2024-04\"], time[datetime^=\"2024-05\"], time[datetime^=\"2024-06\"] ) li { list-style-type: \"\u2741 \"; } body:has( time[datetime^=\"2024-07\"], time[datetime^=\"2024-08\"], time[datetime^=\"2024-09\"] ) li { list-style-type: \"\u2742 \"; } J\u2019avais envie d\u2019introduire une l\u00e9g\u00e8re saisonnalit\u00e9 dans mes listes \u00e0 puces. Surtout une autre excuse pour jouer avec :has(). Je lis un peu trop de blogs qui manquent de fantaisie. Et puis il\u00a0pleut\u2026 Chant du cardinal Le matin s\u2019\u00e9veille sans toi Lov\u00e9e dans mes\u00a0bras" |
|
|
|
"content": "Removing the brand from the person is all but straightforward. I now start my about page with a quick way to introduce myself by putting forward some of my values. [\u2026] Beside saying people instead of users, stop considering who\u2019s reading my stuff as audience, and quit referring to what I do as content, I want to modify a few more\u00a0behaviours: Quit mentioning well-known bloggers on a first-name basis. [\u2026] Keep writing about different things. [\u2026] Don\u2019t quote so-called thought leaders\u00a0[\u2026] Stop sugar-coating concepts\u00a0[\u2026] A Kafkaesque digital relationship with\u00a0ourselves R\u00e9flexion du jour sur le vocabulaire qui \u00e9volue pour se pr\u00e9senter sur le Web. Je suis souvent intrigu\u00e9 par les biographies et textes de pr\u00e9sentation sur mastodon qui sont \u00e0 la fois singuliers tout en respectant des codes (micro-)culturels. Peut-\u00eatre que l\u2019on a besoin de se sentir dans un cadre de repr\u00e9sentation connu pour se sentir exister dans une\u00a0communaut\u00e9. Le m\u00eame auteur, en\u00a02002(!)\u00a0: Five years ago there was all this buzz about virtual communities. How did that go? I have no idea, all I know is that everything revolves around who\u2019s the hottest blogger right now. They talk about themselves, reference each other, all anxious about who has the most comments or the longest and most prestigious blogroll. Compared to that, my online journal is pure mental masturbation, but at least I have the occasional good photo and such nice\u00a0typography. Years just pass\u00a0by body:has(time[datetime]) li { list-style-type: \"\u2767 \"; } body:has( time[datetime^=\"2024-01\"], time[datetime^=\"2024-02\"], time[datetime^=\"2024-03\"] ) li { list-style-type: \"\u2746 \"; } body:has( time[datetime^=\"2024-04\"], time[datetime^=\"2024-05\"], time[datetime^=\"2024-06\"] ) li { list-style-type: \"\u2741 \"; } body:has( time[datetime^=\"2024-07\"], time[datetime^=\"2024-08\"], time[datetime^=\"2024-09\"] ) li { list-style-type: \"\u2742 \"; } J\u2019avais envie d\u2019introduire une l\u00e9g\u00e8re saisonnalit\u00e9 dans mes listes \u00e0 puces. Surtout une autre excuse pour jouer avec :has(). Je lis un peu trop de blogs qui manquent de fantaisie. Et puis il\u00a0pleut\u2026 Chant du cardinal Le matin s\u2019\u00e9veille sans toi Lov\u00e9e dans mes\u00a0bras" |
|
|
|
}, |
|
|
|
{ |
|
|
|
"title": "Flow", |
