Publishing

david/2021/06/20/index.html

@@ -75,6 +75,13 @@
 <p><cite><a href="https://github.com/benbjohnson/litestream#open-source-not-open-contribution">Open-source, not open-contribution</a></cite></p>
 </blockquote>
 <p>Je ne crois pas avoir déjà croisé une annonce du genre. Je ne suis pas sûr de savoir quoi en penser. Toujours <a href="/david/2021/06/04/">cet entre-deux</a> incertain entre les différentes échelles et prises de soins respectives.</p>
+<p><mark>Note après publication&nbsp;:</mark></p>
+<p>Mathieu m’indique que le <a href="https://elm-lang.org/">langage Elm</a> a un mode de contribution un peu similaire par «&nbsp;paquets&nbsp;»&nbsp;:</p>
+
+<blockquote lang="en">
+<p>The major benefit of batching is that the review process is <em>structured</em> for coherent design. By allowing time for folks to share their experiences and suggestions, it becomes possible to consider them all together and better balance their needs. Shifting towards real-time responses on everything would necessarily degrade the overall design quality.</p>
+<p><cite><em><a href="https://github.com/elm/expectations/blob/master/batching.md#batching">Batching</a></em> (<a href="/david/cache/2021/34dbd7a73608c6cde4adf12c4a7084c0/">cache</a>)</cite></p>
+</blockquote>
 
 <nav>
   <p class="center">

david/2021/sources/2021-06-20 - Contribution.md

@@ -9,3 +9,12 @@
 > <cite>[Open-source, not open-contribution](https://github.com/benbjohnson/litestream#open-source-not-open-contribution)</cite>
 
 Je ne crois pas avoir déjà croisé une annonce du genre. Je ne suis pas sûr de savoir quoi en penser. Toujours [cet entre-deux](/david/2021/06/04/) incertain entre les différentes échelles et prises de soins respectives.
+
+
+==Note après publication :==
+
+Mathieu m’indique que le [langage Elm](https://elm-lang.org/) a un mode de contribution un peu similaire par « paquets » :
+
+> [en] The major benefit of batching is that the review process is *structured* for coherent design. By allowing time for folks to share their experiences and suggestions, it becomes possible to consider them all together and better balance their needs. Shifting towards real-time responses on everything would necessarily degrade the overall design quality.
+> 
+> <cite>*[Batching](https://github.com/elm/expectations/blob/master/batching.md#batching)* ([cache](/david/cache/2021/34dbd7a73608c6cde4adf12c4a7084c0/))</cite>

david/log/index.xml

@@ -27,6 +27,13 @@
 <p><cite><a href="https://github.com/benbjohnson/litestream#open-source-not-open-contribution">Open-source, not open-contribution</a></cite></p>
 </blockquote>
 <p>Je ne crois pas avoir déjà croisé une annonce du genre. Je ne suis pas sûr de savoir quoi en penser. Toujours <a href="https://larlet.fr/david/2021/06/04/">cet entre-deux</a> incertain entre les différentes échelles et prises de soins respectives.</p>
+<p><mark>Note après publication :</mark></p>
+<p>Mathieu m’indique que le <a href="https://elm-lang.org/">langage Elm</a> a un mode de contribution un peu similaire par « paquets » :</p>
+
+<blockquote lang="en">
+<p>The major benefit of batching is that the review process is <em>structured</em> for coherent design. By allowing time for folks to share their experiences and suggestions, it becomes possible to consider them all together and better balance their needs. Shifting towards real-time responses on everything would necessarily degrade the overall design quality.</p>
+<p><cite><em><a href="https://github.com/elm/expectations/blob/master/batching.md#batching">Batching</a></em> (<a href="https://larlet.fr/david/cache/2021/34dbd7a73608c6cde4adf12c4a7084c0/">cache</a>)</cite></p>
+</blockquote>
 &lt;hr/&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:david@larlet.fr&quot;&gt;Réagir ?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
         </entry>