davidbgk
/
larlet-fr-david
Watch 1
Star 0
Fork 0
Code Releases 0 Activity
Repository with sources and generator of https://larlet.fr/david/ https://larlet.fr/david/
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
288 Commits
1 Branch
Tree: 215e169fba
Branches Tags
${ item.name }
Create branch ${ searchTerm }
from '215e169fba'
${ noResults }
larlet-fr-david/david/stream/2018/05/06/index.md

index.md 1.3KB
Raw Normal View History

Add initial content
4 years ago
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
 1234567891011121314 
  1. title: Compromised safety

  2. lang: en

  3. 

  4. > So let’s exaggerate a little? To make this more relatable? When you interact with someone whose Symbolic Violence/Hexis/cultural capital is much higher than yours you are condemned to “hit yourself” in an unpleasant way?

  5. >

  6. > The central question after all this is: Society has conditioned you to “hit yourself” when talking to people passing certain patterns and you have them in a team how can you work? What methods can even work in that situation?

  7. >

  8. > Agility is ridiculously unequipped for that: To improve the team we are supposed to reflect on the issues, communicate them, decide experiments and follow trough them: every part of this depend on a safety that is compromised.

  9. >

  10. > A Pair programming or mob session where one of the participants is hitting oneself is not a co-creation, it is submission.

  11. > 

  12. > <cite>*[Agility should pay attention to Sociology](https://medium.com/@Romeu/agility-should-pay-attention-to-sociology-b671fd056933)* ([cache](/david/cache/411dafd9e42e5af6372b06dbdab5d3a7/))</cite>

  13. 

  14. A follow-up invoking Sociology and Bourdieu to explain [Power Dynamics](/david/stream/2018/05/02/). Still thinking about that. From a scientific point of view, inequalities are necessary for movement, hence life? Requires some more digging.