# Intendant

Le 23 mars 2024

> In Why We Can’t Have Nice Software, I point out this pattern of needless software churn in the mindless quest for profit. This is a perfect example occurring right now. Redict has already reached its peak; it does not need any more serious software development to occur. It does not need to pivot to AI. It can be maintained for decades to come with minimal effort. It can continue to provide a high amount of value for a low amount of labor. That’s the entire point of software!

> Redict does not have any profit left to offer. It no longer needs a fund-raising entity behind it anymore. It just needs a good project steward.

> Redis Renamed to Redict
> [archive]

Je me pose beaucoup de questions sur cette notion de finitude logicielle. Et sur le fait de parfois créer ma propre nécessité, sans en avoir forcément conscience ou l’intention.

J’y vois un parallèle avec une frugalité que je n’arrive pas à atteindre, les deux étant probablement liés.

Il me reste encore tellement de choses à démêler…

> So, yeah, I’ve been at this for a while, and this is the answer: Write CSS. Not too much. Mostly scoped.

> I’m sure we’ll never argue about how to manage CSS ever again.

> Write CSS. Not too much. Mostly scoped.
> [archive]

Ça commence par le classique « pour ou contre Tailwind » mais après il y a des choses inspirantes.

> quick q, however: how do they get off the worm when they’ve arrived at their destination

> keep noticing that the movie cuts before they get off, Denis my friend you can’t fool me, how do you stop riding the worm, answer us

> Sydney Sweeney, if you’re free on Thursday,
> [archive]

Tiens c’est vrai ça ! 🤔🤯

Recherche Termes de votre recherche :

Seuls les contenus de ces 8 dernières années sont indexés.