A place to cache linked articles (think custom and personal wayback machine)
Vous ne pouvez pas sélectionner plus de 25 sujets Les noms de sujets doivent commencer par une lettre ou un nombre, peuvent contenir des tirets ('-') et peuvent comporter jusqu'à 35 caractères.

index.md 6.7KB

title: Google + 1yr url: https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2015/03/29/Anniversaries hash_url: cd48ce5c2d

As of this mon­th, I’ve been an ex-Googler for a year. Some­times I miss it, but my rearview-mirror feel­ings are mixed.

What I miss · Most of al­l, the bug track­er. Any em­ploy­ee can file a bug against any prod­uct and be cer­tain that some­one on the en­gi­neer­ing team will at least look at it. There are cer­tain internal-social-engineering tech­niques you can use to fo­cus at­ten­tion on an is­sue you think isn’t get­ting enough. Lots of bug re­ports are feature-requests and oth­ers are feature-removal de­mand­s, and that’s fine.

Giv­en Google’s glob­al im­pact, that bug track­er is one of the sin­gle most pow­er­ful world-changing tools that most peo­ple will nev­er have ac­cess to.

I al­so miss the high pol­ish of the in­ter­nal Google-apps de­ploy­men­t. When you put your work­ing life 100% in the cloud, and have re­al­ly good shar­ing and col­lab­o­ra­tion tool­s, the no­tion of “office documents” stored in “hard-drive files” be­comes more and more self-evidently in­sane. This is ob­vi­ous­ly where the world is head­ing; I hope Google gets more good com­pe­ti­tion.

I’m pret­ty meh on Google’s so­cial ef­fort­s, but the in­ter­nal G+ de­ploy­ment was in­cred­i­bly ef­fec­tive for community-building, self-organizing around one thing or an­oth­er, and col­lec­tive­ly laugh­ing at the laugh­able.

Be­ing paid part­ly in Google shares in the pe­ri­od 2010-2014 was pret­ty pleas­ing. And yep, the food is ev­ery­thing they say; I won­der if the Cloud café is still op­er­at­ing? There are all the oth­er perks and good­ies you hear about, but they were a no-op for a re­mote work­er like me.

Work­ing around lots of re­al­ly super-smart peo­ple was nice, but I haven’t had to give that up, thank good­ness.

Neu­tral · I’m broad­ly in sym­pa­thy with most of what Google’s try­ing to do. Most of the peo­ple who are para­noid about Google are most­ly wrong. But yeah, in­di­vid­u­als in Google’s man­age­ment (and sep­a­rate­ly, Prod­uct Man­age­men­t) com­mu­ni­ties have im­mense pow­er; and at the end of the day, they’re just peo­ple. Thus some of them are mis­guid­ed some­times, or have drunk too much Google kool-aid. Hin­t: Just be­cause most of Google’s ac­tions have im­proved the In­ter­net doesn’t mean that any­thing that’s good for Google is good for the world, or for the In­ter­net.

Yeah, I thought that a few of the pol­i­cy de­ci­sions I saw when I was in An­droid, and then in Iden­ti­ty, were some com­bi­na­tion of crazy, mis­guid­ed, and dam­ag­ing. But at the end of the day, that’s not a gripe against Google; be­cause there’s no com­pa­ny that doesn’t have occasionally-wrong em­ploy­ees.

Google re­mains ahead of the in­dus­try pack on pri­va­cy, di­ver­si­ty, and com­mu­ni­ty. But that is damn­ing with faint praise.

The number-one pop­u­lar gripe against Google is that they’re watch­ing ev­ery­thing we do on­line and us­ing it to mon­e­tize us. That one doesn’t both­er me in the slight­est. The ser­vices are free so someone’s got­ta pay the ren­t, and that’s the ad­ver­tis­er­s.

Are you wor­ried about Google (or Face­book or Twit­ter or your tele­phone com­pa­ny or Mi­crosoft or Ama­zon) mis­us­ing the da­ta they col­lec­t? That’s per­fect­ly rea­son­able. And it’s al­so a pol­i­cy prob­lem, noth­ing to do with tech­nol­o­gy; the so­lu­tions lie in the do­mains of pol­i­tics and law.

I’m ac­tu­al­ly pret­ty op­ti­mistic that ex­ist­ing leg­is­la­tion and com­mon law might suf­fice to whack any­one who re­al­ly went off the rails in this do­main.

Al­so, I have trou­ble get­ting ex­er­cised about it when we’re fac­ing a wave of hor­ri­ble, tox­i­c, per­va­sive pri­va­cy at­tacks from abu­sive gov­ern­ments and ac­tu­al crim­i­nal­s.

Not miss­ing · I’ve been to­tal­ly pub­lic about my #1 gripe with Google: It’s a highly-centralized or­ga­ni­za­tion, based in a part of the world that I don’t much like. I’m not say­ing that’s a bad idea; it seems to be work­ing for them. I’m not even say­ing that it’s a bad idea to do your next start­up in the Bay Area, if you can han­dle the lifestyle.

But I do think the In­ter­net econ­o­my would be bet­ter and more hu­mane if it didn’t have a sin­gle white-hot highly-overprivileged cen­ter. Al­so, soon­er or lat­er that’ll stop scal­ing. Can’t hap­pen too soon.

I’ve al­so talked about the oth­er gripe: The dis­tinc­tion be­tween “user” and “customer”. Yes, I un­der­stand why; see above. But in my four years at Google, I talked to an end­less stream of de­vel­op­ers and end-users  —  and en­joyed it  —  but nev­er ex­changed a sin­gle word with any of the ac­tu­al cus­tomers pay­ing the bill­s; which is to say, an ad­ver­tis­er. Maybe I’m weird, but that still sort of creeps me out.

But I’m not that weird. Ob­vi­ous­ly, Google’s man­agers and own­ers and em­ploy­ees would all love new, non-advertising-focused, lines of busi­ness. The best can­di­dates are Cloud and Doc­s/App­s. I think their chances are bet­ter in Doc­s/App­s, and yeah, maybe that’s be­cause now I see how ruth­less­ly com­pet­i­tive the Cloud biz is.

Lucky again · This busi­ness has been so good to me. I have yet an­oth­er gig where I’m broad­ly in sym­pa­thy with what my em­ploy­er is try­ing to do, and get­ting paid well for it.

From my cur­rent point-of-view, this gig is a win­ner. First, I’m in my home-town work­ing in face-to-face mod­e. Se­cond, I’m work­ing for cus­tomers who pay ac­tu­al mon­ey for ac­tu­al ser­vices, and who I can talk to. And third, the cus­tomers are geeks just like me; un­der­stand­ing their prob­lems is low-effort even when fix­ing them is hard.

Oh, an­oth­er bonus: I no longer have to read the Of­fi­cial Google Blog, or of­fi­cial Google state­ments on any­thing; a hu­man be­ing can on­ly take so much re­lent­less sunny-faced cheer­i­ness.