A place to cache linked articles (think custom and personal wayback machine)
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.

hace 4 años
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667686970717273
  1. title: Against Decentralization
  2. url: http://pudo.org/blog/2015/11/04/against-decentralization.html
  3. hash_url: 50ba5b70350c8d38b7e435ca8452d22d
  4. <p>In the free software/open web community, the notion that the web should be
  5. decentralized is more than a shared ideal, it is a piece of dogma.</p>
  6. <p>It is key to all the characteristics of the web that we are most proud of:
  7. diversity, innovation, the competition of ideas rather than bank accounts.
  8. There are plenty of great reasons to strive for decentralization. Zittrain's
  9. <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Future_of_the_Internet">The Future of the Internet</a> and van Schewick's <a href="http://netarchitecture.org/">Internet Architecture and Innovation</a> make brilliant arguments in this regard.</p>
  10. <p>But it's obviously also a troubled model, and the majority of the web is moving
  11. towards more centralized services. Facebook, Google, Apple, Amazon or even
  12. GitHub and Slack. Most open web advocates stand in opposition to this. They opt
  13. to build small, open source alternative <a href="https://sandstorm.io/">solutions that anyone can run on their
  14. own server</a>.</p>
  15. <p>If you squint really hard, these things kinda, sorta look like the
  16. real thing. But, fundamentally, this is the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ersatz_good">Ersatz web</a> for the nerdy elite. Even worse, it puts open web developers - in a very
  17. literal sense - in a conservative, rather than in a progressive position.</p>
  18. <p>Ad-based data centralization models and cloud services might not be the most
  19. sustainable thing on the planet, but for the moment they simply beat the shit
  20. out of the open web. Our formulaic response is to claim that this is just a
  21. "UX problem". This argument is in total, blissful disregard of the economics
  22. involved.</p>
  23. <p>Making decentralization the only strategy for the open web is a big bet, with
  24. little evidence in it's favor. What are the alternatives?</p>
  25. <p>Figuring out how to get better at making open centralized services is one.
  26. Pushing for innovative government regulation of monopolistic platforms is
  27. another.</p>
  28. <p>Germany <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARD_(broadcaster)">invests 7.6bn Euro a year</a>
  29. into publicly financed news and entertainment media; to make sure that voters
  30. are well-informed and have access to diverse sources of information. While
  31. there's already the odd iPhone app and web site coming out of this, it's time
  32. to fundamentally renegotiate this system for the digital age. Using this money,
  33. we can create public spaces on the web - free software, open knowledge, digital
  34. public goods.</p>
  35. <p>Even a percentage of this fund (and <a href="https://www.mysociety.org/2014/10/16/its-time-to-talk-about-digital-public-service-corporations/">it's UK sibling</a>) would provide enough
  36. resource for Europe to get out of the unhealthy pattern of trying to emulate
  37. Silicon Valley. Instead, we can create an alternative model. One in which
  38. the web is more than a way to connect ads and eyeballs.</p>
  39. <p>The main benefit of decentralization over such alternatives is that it
  40. minimizes the extent to which we have to engage with real-world politics and
  41. the economics of operating large-scale web services. We are deeply infatuated
  42. with the notion of solving political problems through technology.</p>
  43. <p>The poster child of this, of course, is Bitcoin and the blockchain. While ideas
  44. like smart contracts are genuinely innovative and interesting, the naive dream
  45. of digital currencies remains that they will catapult us into libertarian
  46. nirvana, a world in which all politics is protocol.</p>
  47. <p>Many smart political choices are embedded in the core of internet architecture.
  48. But there's an equal number of risks - network effects, data silos - that
  49. technology just wasn't able to avoid. We shouldn't be stuck re-fighting those
  50. lost battles, but instead commit to using political process to address them.</p>
  51. <p>This means working with government. You know, the thing our buddy Barlow said
  52. didn't exist in cyberspace but that somehow still got full take on our web
  53. traffic. It's no longer cool to engage with government only when they're about
  54. to screw things up - net censorship, surveillance, copyright policy - and to
  55. pretend that all political issues on the web can be solved given enough
  56. distributed hash tables.</p>
  57. <p>So, what's the alternative to decentralization? Laws. Public service websites.
  58. Creating commons infrastructure. But let's just not pretend any more that the
  59. future of the web is all about better UX for our IRC clients.</p>