davidbgk
/
larlet-fr-david-cache
Watch 1
Star 0
Fork 0
Code Releases 0 Activity
A place to cache linked articles (think custom and personal wayback machine)
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
386 Commits
1 Branch
Tree: 05a3b01e4d
Branches Tags
${ item.name }
Create branch ${ searchTerm }
from '05a3b01e4d'
${ noResults }
larlet-fr-david-cache/cache/2024/55c19feff784a41d2527b5f1589.../index.md

index.md 1.2KB
Raw Normal View History

Links
7 months ago
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
 1234567891011 
  1. title: activitypub-powered wikis

  2. url: https://alexsirac.com/activitypub-powered-wikis/

  3. hash_url: 55c19feff784a41d2527b5f1589d931d

  4. archive_date: 2024-03-26

  5. og_image: https://alexsirac.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/cropped-cropped-portraitplante-32x32.webp

  6. description: 

  7. favicon: https://alexsirac.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/cropped-cropped-portraitplante-32x32.webp

  8. language: fr_FR

  9. 

  10. <p>what i <em>would</em> like to see in terms of ActivityPub-powered wikis is a beautiful federated network of very focused wikis. more of a fandom.org competitor than a wikipedia.org competitor, really − get the torchlight wiki and the asoiaf wiki and the grenoble wiki talking together, let us contribute to all with our personal accounts,</p>

  11. <p>idk if it’s possible <a href="https://ibis.wiki/article/Announcing_Ibis,_the_federated_Wikipedia_Alternative@ibis.wiki">to beat wikipedia</a>, but i don’t think it’s really valuable − wikipedia works because it has 20 years of building rules and a relatively homogeneous community, which has the good and the bad. i just think it’s more worthwhile to think about building an alternative for all the wikis that would actually benefit from this.</p>